Thursday 19 April 2018

Into the Woods: Trees in Photography at the V&A, recommended.

In this free exhibition at the V&A, trees are being presented by different photographers from different periods. The pictures are mostly black and white photographs, but there are also some colour photographs by other well known photographers. In the older photographs the trees are pictured for their botanical interest; in the more recent ones it is their poetic symbolism that catches the eye & the mind.
Photo by Ansel Adams courtesy of Pinterest
In this blog I am not able to write about each individual photographer due to the wide variety of work on display. I will be highlighting some works only. The exhibition features both classic and contemporary images and depicts our relationship with trees over the years; it also highlights the development of photography during this time. Trees are shown as symbolic, as abstract, destined for destruction, for poetry; each photograph is individual, has an individual narrative. It also makes us think about the roles that trees play for us, for example absorbing pollution and cleansing our air, contributing to our  wellbeing.  We should not take them for granted. In the exhibition there are famous photographers such as Ansel Adams, Henri Cartier-Bresson, and Agnes Warburg. There are also examples of manipulated photographs for example the 1839 photograph  by Johann Carl Enslen and recent works by Tokihiro Sato, titled ‘In the Forests of the Hakkoda Mountains’ see pic below. Trees offer an abundance of possibilities, their cycles changing with the seasons,  some wild, some cultivated. The pictures are often lyrical.
Photo by Tokihiro Sato courtesy of Pinterest
One work that stood out for me was the photograph by Tal Shoshat called ‘Rimon (pomegranate) Afarsimon 2011’ see pic. below, a tree ripe with fruits standing in front of a black background lit artificially. It isolates the tree from the landscape and presents it as a monument. It is a symbol of fertility and of endurance. The fruits are pomegranates, at their peak of their growing cycle. This made me think of an artificial garden of Eden, natural and fabricated at the same time,
not to be encountered in real life.
Photo by Tal Shoshat, courtesy of Pinterest
Tal Shoshat cleans the branches and leaves before shooting the photos and takes photographs of trees that grow in Israel. I found the work theatrical, different from all the other photos in the exhibition. It is one of the few colour photographs in the exhibition. Instead of taking a portrait of a person Shoshat takes one of a tree. I found it interesting that Tal Shoshat titled it Afarsimon
which in the Talmud & Midrash means balsam. The ancient Jewish community of Ein Gedi was cultivating it. It was considered to be very precious and used as an oil, the oil of persimmon. Persimmons are very rich  fruits cultivated in large numbers in Israel, the fruit is seen as a  symbol of fertility in many cultures.
Tal Shoshat’s photographs are about the contrast between reality and artifice, they question the honesty of photography as a documentary medium.

Photo by Robert Adams, courtesy of Pinterest
Another photograph I focused on was one completely different in meaning and in nature. This was by Robert Adams, titled ‘On Signal Hill Overlooking Long Beach California 1983’. This is in gelatin silver print on paper. Robert Adams photographic interest is in the connection between landscape & humans, and the impact that humans have had on the American landscape. The photograph in question is black and white. The trees are an image of nature as a whole. Taken on the outskirts of suburbia, they feel lost, fragile, thin, battered, and a reminder of what’s left of nature. The cityscape is suffocated by smog. It’s a powerful photograph showing the results of human activity on the environment. This is in contrast to the 19th century photographs of the American West,  for example by Timothy O’ Sullivan, which showed the American landscape as huge untouched spaces and still wild see pic below. 
Photo by Timothy O'Sullivan courtesy of Pinterest
Robert Adams instead is concerned with the destruction of nature. He transforms the pictures of the trees into a dying presence and rejects the conventions of beauty of the landscape of the 19th century photographers. The trees shown here appear exhausted by the interference of humans and their constant meddling with nature. His photographs are a living document of what is left of the natural world. It is an understated, alluding photograph that opens up a bigger narrative. He is a keen walker, like I am. Some of his greatest photographs have come out of his walking expeditions. Through his photography he depicts the everyday in life and the changes that nature is going through. In his series ‘Turning Back 1990-2003’see pic below, he was focusing on the destruction of the tall trees of the American North West where they used clearcutting despite opposition, and have substantially reduced the original forest. His work records the changes by man on the landscape and I think he grieves about the losses of trees.

Photo by Robert Adams courtesy of Pinterest
I also enjoyed seeing the photograph by Joseph Sudek titled ‘The Window of My Studio 1944-1954’ see pics below; he was also called the Poet of Prague. His photographs are evocative and poetic, and he took many shots from his studio. In this specific photograph he points at the communion between outside and inside, it’s a reflection on the two coming together, the exterior world and the interior world, the relationship between the real world and the mysterious.

Photo by Joseph Sudek courtesy of Pinterest
They are intimate photographs taken in his studio. He was fascinated with light and was a master at pigment printing and thus was able to create very atmospheric photographs, which make the viewer reflect. They are gentle. Few people appear in his pictures; he was considered to be shy and he only had one arm. Despite this he carried his own cameras and was a resilient character. He also took photographs of the wooden landscape in Bohemia. They remind me of romanticism, a period I have been looking to with my own work. He used the camera to explore Prague, and the world around him. Even when the city was ravaged by war he kept focusing on the everyday beauty of life. He used to take walks circling around the town. The resulting photographs came under the series titled ‘Prague Panoramic’ see pic. below.

Photo by Joseph Sudek courtesy of Pinterest
His photographs are intimate and haunting. He was badly injured during World War I.  I always admired his resilience and the way he pushed forward with photography in challenging times.  Sometimes he adjusted the camera using his teeth. I think he created his own style of romanticism. He creates a specific atmosphere in his photographs of his garden and his trees.  He kept taking pictures even when the Nazis were taking over Czechoslovakia, showing sad, melancholic photos of the city under occupation. His studio turned into a hub for other artists. He made use of a view camera which resulted in slow photography,  waiting for a long time before taking the image.

Photo by Jerry Uelsmann courtesy of Pinterest
Finally I liked the image by Jerry Uelsmann called ‘Untitled 1969’ see pic above.
He is interested in the surreal in photography, he creates fantasy scenes incorporating trees. He created this amazing photograph before the use of digital technology by using multiple negatives. We see a tree floating in air above the ground over a lake. It speaks to the viewer’s imagination calling him/her to complete the image. There is no one way of reading it. It takes a lot of skill & hard work to produce his photographs. He loves working in the darkroom. He is not restricted to one single negative.  His work requires skilled assemblage. The image is black and white, it’s a dreamscape with an open psychological meaning; he creates an alternate reality. His picture goes beyond actual landscape, it’s more a work of imagination and prompts the viewer to tap into the unconscious see pics below, it’s an emotional work away from the conceptual.

Photos by Jerry Uelsmann courtesy of Pinterest


Tuesday 17 April 2018

Exhibition of Mark Ruwedel's photos at Tate Modern, Boiler House level 2 West.

Photo by Mirta Imperatori of Mark Ruwedel's work.
Late on Friday I decided to wander around Tate Modern to view the exhibition by Mark Ruwedel see pic. above; it was late so there was hardly anybody around which was great. I was able to spend more time focusing on the work without getting disturbed. Mark Ruwedel takes photographs of the North American landscape, presenting the human interaction with the landscape and what is left behind by human activity. The photographs are shown in sequence, they are small and are surrounded by a white frame. They force you to look in and slow down. I didn't feel the lighting in the room was correct; if you didn't pay attention, then at a distance the pictures tend to blend into themselves, with the detail getting lost see pic below.

Photo by Mirta Imperatori of Mark Ruwedel's work
I would have liked to see a different type of lighting, showing more detail of the photographs.
The photographs are ghostly views of flatlands, lines of tracks barely visible stretching into the distance, cutting through rocks. They are beautiful photographs taken with care, mid frontal shots, classical in terms of proportions and presented in an ordered way. They reminded me of Robert Adams.

Photo by Mark Ruwedel courtesy of Pinterest
I particularly liked the selection of empty houses left abandoned in the desert see pic above; they look like they are in the middle of nowhere but they are actually not far from LA. He is interested in the human trace, what is left behind after human activity  and the way the space has been used. He is questioning the notion of  'pure nature' showing that it's been degraded by human activity to the point where original nature no longer exists and the landscape has become an historical archive of human activity. He takes photos over and over again of the same subject using old fashioned methods: an analogue camera, old fashioned paper and traditional darkrooms methods.

Photo by Mark Ruwedel courtesy of Pinterest
He is attracted to neglected spaces. The houses in his photos are abandoned homes see pic. above, showing the residual traces of the human presence,  some of the houses have been so neglected that they are just disappearing back into the desert landscape. This prompts thoughts of transitoriness of human life with migration from one place to another. So a house that used to be someone's cherished home is no longer inhabited and degrades into nothing, it gives out a feeling of emptiness. The photographs share a sense of vulnerability and precariousness; according to Ruwedel they are tragic as they allude to a harsh environment.

Photo by Mark Ruwedel courtesy of Pinterest
Next to the above pictures there is also a series of photographs documenting areas in the Western United States, again photos of the desolate vast landscapes, named after hell or the devil by explorers and settlers, evoking the harsh environment, then unpopulated, now an historical archive of human presence see pic. above.
I was particularly interested also in his project called 'Following Nigel' where he literally followed long distance hiker Nigel Naab walking across Los Angeles.  He was following his own route across as many neighbourhoods as possible, both actual districts but also economic, social divides. Mark Ruwedel photographed what he found interesting along the way; he explored the different areas from the point of view of someone on foot, focusing on the signs of human movement. This particular work made me think of Vito Acconci & his work: 'Following Piece (October 3-25 1969)' where he picked a person at random & follow them until they entered a car, a building or a cinema.

Photo by Mark Ruwedel courtesy of Pinterest 
Most of the photographs in the exhibition are gelatin silver prints on paper, they are quite faint, giving a ghostly pallor.  There is also a series of photos of the edges of dried up lakes in the Californian desert, lakes formed thousands of years ago by melting glaciers see pic. above.
This is very topical because the disappearance of the lakes coincided with the arrival of humans. The photos invite us to think about the relationship between humans and landscape and the degradation that often follows human arrival. There is a further series of photos he took at the Wendover Air Force Base in Utah; this is where the pilots of the Enola Gay trained for the bombing of Hiroshima. The crafters shown in the photos are more recent.
I noticed towards the end of the exhibition a series of photos in homage to pop artist Ed Ruscha. Ruwedel took photos of fifteen apartments shown in Ruscha's series; they present a study on the changes of the urban landscape of Los Angeles.

Social Media.

The shooting at YouTube was really shocking. It was reported in the news that the shooter spent her whole time online, it sounds like her whole identity was based on her online activity and when  YouTube pulled the plug by filtering her content her identity collapsed, imploded. She was fixated by projecting her persona through YouTube and felt a sense of grievance which could have also occurred through non digital interactions.

Social media can be very addictive; basically they try to keep you on their sites as long as possible to make money. We are constantly checking for updates, interrupting the regular flow of things in the real world; it is the same with videos, you have to constantly upload videos to remain relevant. Nowadays in London you see a lot of people staring at their smart phones while walking, on transport, inside cafes, people are no longer talking or looking at each other, they have their noses peeled onto their screen, oblivious to the surrounding world; the real world is just another interruption from ones checking ones own screen. The irony is the more we seek to connect to others in the virtual world through social media the more we become disconnected from the real world. Isn't social media more ephemeral than real friends in the real world? There have been several studies done on this, where participants were found to feel more isolated after spending more than two hours on social media. Also more importantly people that spend longer times online were found to be less tolerant, less accepting of other people in the real world.

The fact is that interactions online can be of the same nature over and over again and you can ensure that your conversations are brief, but when you go back in the real world interactions may not be quite so easily managed. So being online for very long periods of time might leave you ill equipped to deal with problems in the real world. On the other hand, for some people who are house-bound social media can be an important life line where they can meet new people. 

Also the wanting to be constantly connected, worrying that you might not be answering messages, makes people anxious and leaves them unable to spend quiet time with themselves without feeling guilty or uncomfortable, with their minds somewhere else. We can show to the world a better side of ourselves online, for example with a wide ranging selection of filters on Instagram. Then there is the aspect of monetization; some people spend a lot of time online selling stuff on ebay, uploading videos to YouTube, Twitter or Instagram but how much money are users of these sites making? Some are doing very well but others are not, and they are just wasting time a bit like TV binging. The social media companies are making money with advertisements and people's data. Some people have a lot of followers and make an income but others don't make money at all. If one for example spends three hours each day on social media but one doesn't  make any money wouldn't they be better off just having a minimum wage normal job?

Losing followers and money can produce a negative psychological effect, especially to someone with a fragile identity with no real job who spends most of their time online on their own and whose identity revolves around this activity. This can never be an excuse for going around shooting people. I felt terrible for the poor people at YouTube, what a terrifying experience! And then there is the issue of censorship and where it crosses the line from social interest to social control. 

Social media can also be positive, helping people for example to get connected in a positive way. In one particular case a man from Yemen was able to escape war and death thanks to social media.
On the other hand some people, when their ratings go down do dangerous things, for example posting crazy things online to send their ratings back up again. If someone shutdown social media all of a sudden for whatever reason would people have a nervous breakdown or get their lives back? Some people find Facebook really useful in terms of getting info on events that are happening but are worried about the data breach. I do enjoy using YouTube and I have never had any problems with it. 

Also with other social media sites, you can get to meet people you wouldn't normally meet but it's not good to spend excessive amounts of time on it. But we go back to the addiction element of them; whilst you might enjoy interacting with others online, being connected, or having the impression of being connected, the lack of real friendships can bring problems in the real world. Are we really able to switch ourselves off from them? Also there may be a shortage of well paid, real jobs in the world and that's why a lot of people go online in the hope of promoting themselves, to make money. Some people have the false illusion that online you can become a star, they dream of becoming famous like on the TV show Britain's Got Talent. I mean some vloggers on YouTube do very well, but it is a highly competitive global environment, the bottom line is social media sites are a business with a global reach and when they expand too much they still have to deal with growth problems and other issues like any other business.

Some of this is what I have been addressing in my current work which is about isolation and anomie, a sense of disassociation from society. In an age where people are pushed to be constantly connected through digital media where is this leading us? If on one level we are using social media as a distraction from the things that give our life real meaning on another level social media is changing how we relate to each other. My work aims to highlight this dichotomy.
Text & images come under copyright  © 2018 Mirta Imperatori