Galleria Nazionale D'arte Moderna Rome: Alfredo Pirri-Shay Frisch.

                            Galleria Nazionale D'Arte Moderna www.gnam.beniculturali.it/

While visiting Rome I decided to go and see the Galleria Nazionale D'Arte Moderna I was very surprised by the variety and high quality of contemporary art I saw on show in this gem of a Museum.

First of all if you are a tourist visiting the museum I strongly advise you to take n.3 or n.19 tram which stops in front of the museum as it's not a 15 minute walk to the museum from Piazza del Popolo as some people say when it's dark I wouldn't advise tourists to walk through the park Villa Borghese late in the afternoon in winter, especially if you are going on your own, it's much better in full delight where there other people around in the summer. Also I have read on some websites that the National Gallery of Modern Art doesn't have a cafe', this is actually incorrect. The cafe' is not inside the museum but you have to go out outside and walk to the back of the museum where it is located, beautiful in the summer but not to sure in the winter I guess it's ok.

While entering the building pass security I was transported straight away into a different space. I kind of left the present space I was in and the traffic of Rome and went into an altered space thanks to the work of the Italian artist Alfredo Pirri (born 1957 lives and works in Rome) and his artwork titled Passi (Steps) I literally stepped into the art work as it is made of wide broken glass and I was braking it even further by walking on it so that I could reach on foot the main exhibition area, I was basically forced to do it as there was no other way to reach the exhibition area.                                                

  

Alfredo Pirri, Passi.

I thought this was great fun,  to be able as a visitor to participate in the art work and be able to change the structure of the artwork by walking on it so by breaking even further the glass I was walking on, permanently changing the image of the art work and the vision of it, the image and the memory of it, so that really there is never a final image as the artwork gets constantly cracked by visitors.
As a viewer I didn't see any separation from myself and the art work I did not feel separated as one might look at an image from a still point of view at a distance I also felt unsure walking on it at how much further I was breaking the image and the artwork but excited that with my movement I was producing a further alteration to the art work. The breaking of the glass made met think also at the fragility of life itself and at how things both in real life and in art are constantly changing.
When I reached the main exhibition area I turned and looked back at the art work  & felt like I had just been through some sort of mental portal, this was given by the artist counterpointing the stylish shiny squares of broken glass with stylised white statues, white walls & columns. Because of this I felt like had been enveloped in an ever changing defined altered space. He basically made the best of the space that was already there and the artwork worked really well in this wide important space and it wasn't finished there...

I was initially supposed to see the Paul Klee exhibition but the permanent collection on the ground floor and other floors was so good that I lost track of time so I kept wondering around from room to room and then by mistake I ended up viewing first Shay Frisch's work on the second floor before Paul Klee's work.

                                                   Shay Frisch Peri, Campo 100535 B/N

Shay Frisch Peri is an Israeli artist &  Industrial designer that works and lives in Rome.

He works with light & space. The first work I saw  geometrical in form enclosed in a geometrical white tower inside it was black with an orange bright light going through the work and for me far to claustrophobic but the strong geometrical form and black (darkness) and white (light) both of the outside and on on the inside made me think of a modern version of a church or a chapel so of a spiritual aspect of the art work. I moved quickly to the second room which felt more opened and I was faced by squares of light white adaptors. In this room the art works where made out of the same materials as in the first room. The work it's self is made of endlessly repeated electrical adaptors (the light is shown as volumetric thanks to the actual structure of the adaptors) like some form of light sculpture made out of geometrical forms squared or circles or completely white or completely black with bright orange light beaming from the art work in a linear way which made me think of a minimalist and a precise  controlled way of arranging the work. The light adaptors united together create a new reality, a different way of painting that takes into account architecture, light and space. I found the modern monochrome use of colours (light adaptors) and the juxtaposition of dark and light, spiritual like looking at the Rothko's paintings when I went to the Tate Modern, it was peaceful. The artist didn't force me to participate but to be an observer and to take whatever I wanted to take from the experience. I did wonder thought at how much did it cost to keep the beaming  light on all the time and would the artwork still function if it was made with out the light beaming through it? The answer is no it wouldn't work as the light added volume and changed the meaning of the whole artwork itself. Without the light  it would be like looking at an empty white or black surface even if it was made with adaptors which in itself gave depth to the work.

                                                    Shay Frisch Peri Campo 100535 B/N

                                                    Shay Frisch Peri Campo 10035 B/N

Whitechapel Gallery: Maurizio Cattelan

My tutor at University suggested that it would be good for me to view an artist whose work is very different from mine so I decided to go and see the last day of Maurizio Catellan's exhibition at the Whitechapel Gallery. As I entered the gallery I noticed straight away that there was more of an Italian crowd then a British crowd going around the gallery.

 Maurizio Cattelan Il Bel Paese 1995

The first art work I saw was the 'Bel Paese' piece which was composed of a green rug showing the Bel Paese Italy as in the cheese with the same name by Galbani. The opposition of the word Bel Paese=Beautiful Country & the image of Italy on the rug gave clearly out that there is hypocrisy behind the image of the Bel Paese. The funny thing is  that the supposedly 'Beautiful Country' Bel Paese shown as a rug where one can clean one shoes but is not allowed to do so as the rug was cordoned of which made me laugh: a rug which one can not use.. meaning that the rug is still a work of art worth money and worth of cordoning off. I am not sure if this is a mistake of the curator or if the artist intentionally asked for his work to be cordoned off because if this is the case he is actually giving less meaning to the work. By having it cordoned off he is actually showing his work more as a property with value then anything else which weakens the content of the work or creates a distance with the viewer. As  a viewer I was allowed to look at the piece but I felt kept in my place by the way it was displayed as I or indeed other viewers couldn't clean our shoes on the rug if we wanted to. Yes they have put a Roman hand hanging from the sealing above showing the middle finger at the rug but I felt it was better if one could actually clean one shoes on the rug as I think originally intended.

While the piece Lullaby made out of rubble in a large sack, one could touch this piece as I saw a blind man doing so, but would someone who is not Italian know that they are the remains of the PAC in Via Palestro in 1993 where 6 people died due to a bomb by the Mafia? Hiding the rubble in a sack made me think of the hiding of a trauma, feeling uncomfortable with Italy's troubled past.
There are common elements in his work one for example is Maurizio Cattelan's troubled relationship with some of Italy's dark episodes but also showing them to people who might not know about those episodes highlighting injustice and hypocrisy in the system and  in society or in art. The other work I soon noticed called Bidibidobididiboo made out of a red squirrel slumped on a small table with a gun on the floor all in miniature gave me the impression because of the small size of the piece that I was intruding into a story: that of  the artist as a young man stuck in boring daily routine this was given out by the sink and table, I felt that the artist hates ordinary life and has a need to shock to feel alive if not he is like a trapped defenceless red squirrel in an environment which doesn't belong to him kitchen, sink, table are not really a squirrel environment but ordinary symbols of a common life...To me the red squirrel being an outdoor animal represents the wilderness of the artist that wants to get out but gets killed by domesticity hence the squirrel shot in a home environment. Looking at his work it looks not only funny thanks to  the just apposition of opposite elements but well thought out as everything is well positioned, staged and that he likes to get a reaction from the viewer. I mean he used a real cute red squirrel not an ugly wounded  or maybe a fake one which made the viewer (myself in this case) feel sympathy for the cute squirrel/the artist so for the whole piece. 

 I did wonder where the squirrel got sourced from and why did the gallery or the artist didn't care to mention this? Did he found him already dead or was the squirrel killed to appear especially in the exhibition? Just because he is a squirrel and not a human does it mean an artist can do what they like with it? If it was a human someone would make a claim for the body don't animals have any rights because they don't have a voice? I felt this was the strongest piece in the gallery anyhow.

The other piece with absurd upside down elements was the one with artist himself as a still puppet hanging from a metallic hanger closet wearing no shoes which is an out of place image so the intrinsic absurdity if it and the funny element in it. The puppet of the artist is wearing a woollen or felt grey suit which easily gave away the other artist Joseph Beuys. Don't think Cattelan is keen on idealists artist that want to change society or the artist that present himself as the Savior of society as Beuys represents that's why is hanged in a still frame position to make fun out of it as it can't move to reach the ground, doesn't have shoes. Cattelan represent himself in some of his art work with sometimes an ambivalent meaning open to interpretations as there isn't much description about the art work so it leaves it open to interpretation this goes together with other themes across his work such as shock, absurdity, death, authority & humour.

                                                       Maurizio Cattelan Lullaby 1995

 

Maurizio Cattelan BidibidoBidiDiboo 1996

                                                  Maurizio Cattelan La Rivoluzione Siamo Noi 2000

                                                       
                                         
                                         
                                           

New Art from Russia at the Saatchi Gallery

Just before leaving for Italy I managed to get invited for the opening of the exhibition: New Art from Russia at the Saatchi Gallery. The exhibition was well organised I found the members of stuff informative & it was nice to get a free glass of wine while going around the Gallery. I started looking at the work on the ground floor in particular at Janis Avotins in Gallery 5 ghostly, thinly painted canvases using acrylics of mainly female figures that one can hardly see due to the monochrome use of paints which give an evocative feel to the work.The figures are shown isolated & unrecognisable giving them a sense of phantom like air which somehow fit in between being central while melting into the background of the painting. In the same room there is also the work of Nika Neelova which is made of  Burnt and waxed wood, paper and ink positioned opposite Janis Avotins paintings in the main room so one can go around the sculptural installation made out of old beams, casts and worn ropes so shown, re-composed in a different way from their original use. The just apposition of the ghostly paintings on the walls with the burned & waxed wood in the corners of the room worked well as both artists in different ways deal with history. While Janis Avotins deals with history of memory that disappears the figure from the collective memory making it anonymous. Nika Neelova  works with memory history where we get shown how one reads and distorts in the present the past also shown by the ironic title of the art work.  Then I went to Gallery 10 where I saw the work of Valery Koshlyakov: large scale cardboard paintings forming a collage of the the Grand Opera in Paris again we are looking at how things are seen interpreted such as the old empire and at how everything is ephemeral or a mad fantasy depending on once own interpretation as one can seen from the the unfinished details in which the painting is made not showing a final piece of a solid Opera house but more like a fragile imagined castle. I found interesting the contrast between the flimsy support of the cardboard (which replace the solidity of the canvas) with the subject: the actual Opera House which is reminiscent of opulence, solidity, status completely the opposite of the cardboard.  The use of Tempera in making the work and also the Opera House makes one think that the artist as a keen interest in ancient ruins when I was looking at it I thought I might have been looking at ancient ruins or a building in Rome this was given by the energetic brush strokes of the tempera and the passing by of time contrasted by the use of cardboard and a sense of irony towards monumental Government buildings with a reference to the Stalin era.

In Gallery 4 Daniel Bragin is another artist which questions through the use of opposite materials how we view things like in the work Bedtime Story which is made using broken windshield glass and hold together by PVC strings. I found the piece moving and chilling at the same time. As the Bed cover is not made of a nice woolly comfortable blanket but made of windshield broken glass which one would associate with car accidents, violence possibly a lost childhood a dark bedtime story not a light one and then all hold together by coloured PVC plastic threads which  gives  a touch of lightness, innocence to a rather dark fragile story.

                                                    Jana Avotins  Untitled on canvas 2012

                                                    Nika Neelova Scaffolds Today, Monuments Tomorrow 2011

                                                     

Valery Koshlyakow Grand Opera, 1995

Daniel Bragin Bedtime story 2012